Alaska Gasline Development Corporation (AGDC) and affiliates of ExxonMobil (ticker: XOM), TransCanada (ticker: TRP), BP (ticker: BP) and ConocoPhillips (ticker: COP) filed a FERC pre-filing request, effectively launching the early design phases of their Alaska LNG Project, an estimated $65 billion, 20 MM metric ton LNG facility, to be built in the Nikiski area on the Kenai Peninsula.
Concurrently, Russia’s independent gas producer Novatek (ticker: NVTK) confirmed it received a license from the Russian federal government to export liquefied natural gas, UPI reported this week.
“The Yamal LNG project has the capacity to produce about 16.5 million tons of natural gas and exports could target consumers in the Far East. As many as 16 ice-class carriers will be designated to ship LNG year-round to global consumers,” the report said.
The proposed Alaska LNG project’s facilities include a liquefaction facility in the Nikiski area on the Kenai Peninsula, an 800-mile, large diameter pipeline, up to eight compression stations, at least five take-off points for in-state gas delivery, a gas treatment plant located on the North Slope and transmission lines to transport gas from Prudhoe Bay and Point Thomson to the gas treatment plant.
Work to date in Alaska includes collecting the data necessary to support environmental permitting for the project and to support the routing and siting of project facilities. The majority of the work was focused along the pipeline route from Livengood to the proposed LNG liquefaction facility site in Nikiski.
Sponsors estimate the Alaska LNG project will produce about 15,000 jobs during construction and approximately 1,000 jobs to support its operation. An application for an LNG export license was submitted to the U.S. Department of Energy in July.
In a statement, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that developing large-scale programs on the arctic shelf was critical to Russia’s economic development.
It will be interesting to see how Alaska’s project progresses compared to the proposed Kitimat LNG project in British Columbia. The Kitimat plant has hit snags due to infrastructure constraints and rising cost projections, despite the government’s continuous search for investment.
[sam_ad id=”32″ codes=”true”]
Important disclosures: The information provided herein is believed to be reliable; however, EnerCom, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to its completeness or accuracy. EnerCom’s conclusions are based upon information gathered from sources deemed to be reliable. This note is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or financial instrument of any company mentioned in this note. This note was prepared for general circulation and does not provide investment recommendations specific to individual investors. All readers of the note must make their own investment decisions based upon their specific investment objectives and financial situation utilizing their own financial advisors as they deem necessary. Investors should consider a company’s entire financial and operational structure in making any investment decisions. Past performance of any company discussed in this note should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future results. EnerCom is a multi-disciplined management consulting services firm that regularly intends to seek business, or currently may be undertaking business, with companies covered on Oil & Gas 360®, and thereby seeks to receive compensation from these companies for its services. In addition, EnerCom, or its principals or employees, may have an economic interest in any of these companies. As a result, readers of EnerCom’s Oil & Gas 360® should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this note. The company or companies covered in this note did not review the note prior to publication. EnerCom, or its principals or employees, may have an economic interest in any of the companies covered in this report or on Oil & Gas 360®. As a result, readers of EnerCom’s reports or Oil & Gas 360® should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report.