Crude Oil ( ) Brent Crude ( ) Natural Gas ( ) S&P 500 ( ) PHLX Oil ( )

EnerCom, Inc. compiled first quarter earnings per share, revenue, EBITDA and cash flow per share analyst consensus estimates on 200 E&P and OilService companies in our database.

Click here for the full chart of estimates.

The median OilServices company earnings estimate for the quarter ending March 31, 2015, is $0.11 per share compared to actual earnings per share of $0.02 and $0.29 for Q4’14 and Q3’14, respectively. In Q1’14, the median OilServices company earnings were $0.25. The median E&P company earnings estimate for the quarter ending March 31, 2015, is ($0.03) per share compared to actual earnings per share of $0.07 and $0.39 for Q4’14 and Q3’14, respectively. In Q1’14, the average E&P company earnings was $0.14 per share.

Energy Commodities

Crude Oil. U.S. oil consumption in January 2015 was 19.2 MMBOPD, down 1.3% compared to the prior month and 1.7% higher than the same month last year. U.S. crude oil production was 9.2 MMBOPD, down 1.4% compared to the prior month and 14.8% higher than the same month last year. The average near-term futures price for WTI in March 2015 was $47.85 per barrel, up 1.1% from the prior month and 52.4% lower than the same month last year. The five-year strip at March 31, 2015 was $60.34 per barrel.

bam1

The average price of gasoline (all grades, all formulations) in March 2015 was $2.55 per gallon, 10.6% higher than the previous month but 29.4% lower than the same month last year. In March 2015, the average near-term futures price for Brent was $56.94 per barrel, down 3.1% from the prior month and 19.0% higher than the WTI near-month futures price.

The median analyst estimate at the beginning of March for 2015 NYMEX oil was $54.40 per barrel with a high of $65.90 per barrel and a low of $46.00 per barrel.

bam2

Natural Gas. In January 2015, total natural gas consumption was 100.1 Bcf/d, up 13.6% from the prior month but 3.0% lower than the same month last year. Dry gas production in January 2015 was 73.8 Bcf/d, down -1.1% from December 2014, and up 9.0% over the same month last year.

At 1.5 Tcf (week ending 4/3/15), natural gas storage was 10.5% below the five-year historical average, and 40.4% below the five-year high.

bam3

For the month of January 2015 (the most recent data point), the EIA reported that U.S. LNG imports averaged 0.37 Bcf/d.

The average near-term futures price for Henry Hub in March 2015 decreased to $2.75 per MMBtu or 0.4% lower than the prior month and 38.7% lower than the same month last year. The five-year strip at March 31, 2015 was $3.31 per MMBtu. The median analyst estimate at the beginning of March for 2015 NYMEX gas was $3.00 per MMBtu with a high of $3.90 per MMBtu and a low of $2.70 per MMBtu.

bam4

Rig Count — Natural Gas Rig Count Declines

The U.S. land rig count sourced from RigData on March 27, 2015, stood at 1,064 rigs, a decrease of 1,030 rigs from Q3’14, of which 77% were operating horizontally.

On March 27, 2015, there were 795 horizontal rigs in the U.S., a decrease of 44% from 1,411 in Q4’2014. The number of horizontal rigs targeting natural gas exclusively dropped from December 31, 2011 by 245 rigs to 151 for a decline of 62%.  The number of horizontal rigs targeting oil exclusively decreased from December 31, 2011 by 42 rig to 156 for a decrease of 21%.

By play and as compared to Q4’14, rig count changes on March 27, 2015 include Haynesville (-8 rigs), Fayetteville Shale (-5 rigs), Woodford Shale (-1 rig), Appalachian Basin (-47 rigs), Williston Basin (-87 rigs), Eagle Ford Shale (-82 rigs), DJ Niobrara (-25 rigs) and Permian Basin (-236 rigs).

 bam5

Equity Markets. In March 2015, the S&P 500, XNG, XOI and OSX changed by -1.7%, -1.1%, -3.3% and -4.7% month-to-month, respectively. The S&P 500 had the largest year-over-year increase gaining 10.4% (Slide 24).

From EnerCom’s E&P Database:  For April 3, 2015 year-to-date large-cap, mid-cap, small-cap and micro-cap E&P stocks lost -0.8%, gained 7.6%, 1.8% and lost -22.3%, respectively. Year-to-date, oil-weighted and gas-weighted companies lost -9.6% and -0.7%, respectively.

By region as of April 3, 2015 year-to-date, Bakken, Midcontinent and Diversified stocks gained 10.7%, 3.0%, lost      -2.4%, respectively, Gulf of Mexico stocks were down -13.2%.

From EnerCom’s Oil Service’s Database: As of April 3, 2015 year-to-date, Oil Service’s large-cap and mid-cap stocks lost -4.9%, -5.6%, respectively, while small-cap and micro-cap stocks lost-9.1%, -21.8%, respectively.

Expected Themes for Conference Calls

Below are some themes and thoughts we expect to take prominence on this quarter’s conference calls.

E&P Companies:

  • 2015 commodity price outlook
  • Hedge position and cost control
  • Balance sheet strength and near-term debt maturities
  • Borrowing base redeterminations and bank price decks
  • Midstream contracts and take-away capacity
  • 2015 CapEx and activity levels – exploration vs. development
  • Oilfield service costs and outlook
  • Crude oil and natural gas differentials (Wattenberg, Bakken, etc.)
  • Crude delivery and refining systems (rail systems, etc.)
  • Potential for increasing M&A activity in E&P
  • Year-end reserves vs. current reserves at $53 per bbl oil
  • Storage and refining capacities
  • Wells drilled awaiting delayed completions

OilService Companies:

  • Global economic outlook
  • 2015 CapEx and activity levels
  • Potential for increasing M&A
  • Balance sheet strength and near-term debt maturities
  • Government permitting for LNG ports
  • Growing pressure for US to export
  • Shrinking International margins vs. North American margins
  • Rig Count – Effects of drilling efficiencies
  • Trends and outlook on dayrates and backlog (onshore and offshore drillers)
  • Oilfield service equipment utilization rates
  • Backlog of completions
  • Frac sand and proppant prices

 

Important disclosures: The information provided herein is believed to be reliable; however, EnerCom, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to its completeness or accuracy. EnerCom’s conclusions are based upon information gathered from sources deemed to be reliable. This note is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or financial instrument of any company mentioned in this note. This note was prepared for general circulation and does not provide investment recommendations specific to individual investors. All readers of the note must make their own investment decisions based upon their specific investment objectives and financial situation utilizing their own financial advisors as they deem necessary. Investors should consider a company’s entire financial and operational structure in making any investment decisions. Past performance of any company discussed in this note should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future results. EnerCom is a multi-disciplined management consulting services firm that regularly intends to seek business, or currently may be undertaking business, with companies covered on Oil & Gas 360®, and thereby seeks to receive compensation from these companies for its services. In addition, EnerCom, or its principals or employees, may have an economic interest in any of these companies. As a result, readers of EnerCom’s Oil & Gas 360® should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this note. The company or companies covered in this note did not review the note prior to publication.


Important disclosures: The information provided herein is believed to be reliable; however, EnerCom, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to its completeness or accuracy. EnerCom’s conclusions are based upon information gathered from sources deemed to be reliable. This note is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or financial instrument of any company mentioned in this note. This note was prepared for general circulation and does not provide investment recommendations specific to individual investors. All readers of the note must make their own investment decisions based upon their specific investment objectives and financial situation utilizing their own financial advisors as they deem necessary. Investors should consider a company’s entire financial and operational structure in making any investment decisions. Past performance of any company discussed in this note should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future results. EnerCom is a multi-disciplined management consulting services firm that regularly intends to seek business, or currently may be undertaking business, with companies covered on Oil & Gas 360®, and thereby seeks to receive compensation from these companies for its services. In addition, EnerCom, or its principals or employees, may have an economic interest in any of these companies. As a result, readers of EnerCom’s Oil & Gas 360® should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this note. EnerCom, or its principals or employees, may have an economic interest in any of the companies covered in this report or on Oil & Gas 360®. As a result, readers of EnerCom’s reports or Oil & Gas 360® should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report.