Crude Oil ( ) Brent Crude ( ) Natural Gas ( ) S&P 500 ( ) PHLX Oil ( )

The California Senate removed requirements for a 50% reduction in petroleum use from SB 350

The California legislature passed a law today setting higher renewable energy use and fuel standards, but without a portion of the bill that would have called for a 50% reduction in petroleum use by 2030. The bill, Senate Bill 350, prompted a backlash from the oil and gas industry and divided California Democrats.

The petroleum cut was part of a larger plan to reduce carbon emissions by 80% of 1990 levels by 2050, a piece of legislation first put forward by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, and then carried on by Governor Jerry Brown. SB 350 passed the Democratic-controlled Senate but faced a tougher battle in the Assembly, where Democrats tend to be more moderate and represent economically struggling jurisdictions, reports The New York Times.

Opponents of the bill ran a campaign against SB 350 saying that the deep cuts would lead to fuel rationing, bans on sport utility vehicles and higher electricity costs. California already experiences higher fuel costs than the rest of country. In July, California gas prices were $0.95 higher than the national average. Normally they’re $0.70/gal higher than the national average just from taxes and other fees.

Backers of the bill said the allegations were blown out of proportion. The bill does not mention rationing or any other specific measures, but the arguments proved persuasive.

“Ultimately, California is going to demand that an industry which represents most of the problem has an economic and moral duty to be part of the solution,” said Kevin de Leon, the senator who introduced the bill. De Leon agreed to remove the portion of the bill calling for the 50% cut as part of a compromise, but kept the rest of the bill intact.

Focus on renewables and energy efficiencies

The two less contentious parts of the bill that will remain are a mandate that half of all the state’s energy come from renewable resources, such as wind, by 2030, and a separate measure to double the energy efficiencies of older buildings. Henry Perea, a moderate Democrat who led the opposition to the petroleum measure, said he would support the bill in this form.

“SB 350 will set California apart as a leader in climate change policy and will go a long way in reducing emissions in areas like the Central Valley that suffer from some of the worst air quality in the nation,” he said.

Governor Brown said that he would use his executive powers to continue to force the kinds of reductions in global emissions that have been a central goal of his governorship. “Oil has won the skirmish, but they’ve lost the bigger battle,” he said. “Because I am more determined than ever to make our regulatory regime work for the people of California: cleaning up the air, reducing the petroleum and creating the green jobs that are going to put hundreds of thousands of people to work over the coming decades.”

Catherine Reheis-Boyd, president of the Western States Petroleum Association, was pleased with the outcome. She also said that oil companies “remain committed to working with Gov. Jerry Brown and legislators on climate change and energy policy.” She added that “Californians are best served by inclusive energy policy and by a legislative body that retains authority on issues so critically important to jobs, communities and our way of life.”


Important disclosures: The information provided herein is believed to be reliable; however, EnerCom, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to its completeness or accuracy. EnerCom’s conclusions are based upon information gathered from sources deemed to be reliable. This note is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or financial instrument of any company mentioned in this note. This note was prepared for general circulation and does not provide investment recommendations specific to individual investors. All readers of the note must make their own investment decisions based upon their specific investment objectives and financial situation utilizing their own financial advisors as they deem necessary. Investors should consider a company’s entire financial and operational structure in making any investment decisions. Past performance of any company discussed in this note should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future results. EnerCom is a multi-disciplined management consulting services firm that regularly intends to seek business, or currently may be undertaking business, with companies covered on Oil & Gas 360®, and thereby seeks to receive compensation from these companies for its services. In addition, EnerCom, or its principals or employees, may have an economic interest in any of these companies. As a result, readers of EnerCom’s Oil & Gas 360® should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this note. EnerCom, or its principals or employees, may have an economic interest in any of the companies covered in this report or on Oil & Gas 360®. As a result, readers of EnerCom’s reports or Oil & Gas 360® should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report.