A change to the way oil and gas pollution is regulated is the next big step for the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment.
CDPHE is moving forward to adopt EPA’s air pollution rules. In 2012, EPA set new standards in accordance with cost effective ways of reducing
The Denver Post reported that the need for an overhaul in standards comes from oil and gas industry operations on the Front Range that emit at least 600 tons of contaminants a day causing Colorado locals to question recent increased drilling and it’s health effects. Comparing the Front Range to the larger picture, total U.S. emissions in 2011 equaled 6,702 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent. That’s about 18.6 million tons per day, making the Front Range contaminants only 3.2% of overall emissions every day. The largest contributor of emissions was electricity at 33% of total greenhouse gas emissions, followed by transportation at 28% and 20% from industry sources.
Images from United States Environmental Protection Agency
The proposed measures are as follows:
• Strengthen emission controls on storage tanks;
• Expand statewide the existing pollution control requirements that currently apply in the metro Denver and north Front Range areas that fail to meet federal ozone standards;
• Establish leak-detection and repair requirements for oil and gas wellheads and compressor stations;
• Encourage the routing of natural gas into a sales pipeline within six months after new wells are drilled;
• Streamline permitting requirements by increasing the permit threshold from two to five tons per year of pollution to 25 tons per year;
• Raise thresholds for reporting oil and gas pollution.
Colorado Drilling Activity
So far in 2013, approximately 2,057 drilling permits were approved in 27 of Colorado’s 64 counties. Weld County, Colorado (home to the Wattenberg Field) ranked number one on the list.
Important disclosures: The information provided herein is believed to be reliable; however, EnerCom, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to its completeness or accuracy. EnerCom’s conclusions are based upon information gathered from sources deemed to be reliable. This note is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or financial instrument of any company mentioned in this note. This note was prepared for general circulation and does not provide investment recommendations specific to individual investors. All readers of the note must make their own investment decisions based upon their specific investment objectives and financial situation utilizing their own financial advisors as they deem necessary. Investors should consider a company’s entire financial and operational structure in making any investment decisions. Past performance of any company discussed in this note should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future results. EnerCom is a multi-disciplined management consulting services firm that regularly intends to seek business, or currently may be undertaking business, with companies covered on Oil & Gas 360®, and thereby seeks to receive compensation from these companies for its services. In addition, EnerCom, or its principals or employees, may have an economic interest in any of these companies. As a result, readers of EnerCom’s Oil & Gas 360® should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this note. The company or companies covered in this note did not review the note prior to publication. EnerCom, or its principals or employees, may have an economic interest in any of the companies covered in this report or on Oil & Gas 360®. As a result, readers of EnerCom’s reports or Oil & Gas 360® should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. As of the report date, neither EnerCom nor any of its employees has a financial interest in any equity or debt of any company mentioned in this report.