Crude Oil ( ) Brent Crude ( ) Natural Gas ( ) S&P 500 ( ) PHLX Oil ( )

This morning, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two cases where cities sought reinstatement of their bans on hydraulic fracturing and certain other oil and gas related activities within their city limits.

In one case, the Fort Collins, Colorado, city council had banned hydraulic fracturing in 2013.  The Colorado Oil and Gas Association filed lawsuits challenging the ban and moratorium, arguing that bans are illegal because only the state has the ability to regulate drilling, not cities or municipalities. Followers of the issue have made the case that taking the permitting process out of the state’s hands and handing off authority to local cities and towns would result in a “checkerboard” of regulations across the state that would make permitting for oil and gas development extremely difficult and could deter investment by oil and gas companies in the state.

A Point of Light: Diamondback Energy

Oil rig in Weld County, Colorado – the Wattenberg Field

The City of Longmont passed its own regulations concerning oil and gas exploration within city limits, leading to a lawsuit filed by the Colorado attorney general. Afterward, Longmont voters passed a ban on fracing. Lower courts in Boulder and Larimer counties overturned the ban and the moratorium, ruling that regulation of oil and gas drilling is the sole purvey of the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission.

The Colorado Court of Appeals asked the Colorado Supreme Court to hear the Longmont and Fort Collins cases.

The video files of today’s Supreme Court proceedings for both cases may be viewed here. Each side of the argument was given 30 minutes to present its case to the Supreme Court, in both cases–9:00 a.m. for Case Number 15SC667, City of Longmont v. Colorado Oil and Gas Association, and 10:00 a.m. for Case Number 15SC668, City of Fort Collins v. Colorado Oil and Gas Association.


Important disclosures: The information provided herein is believed to be reliable; however, EnerCom, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to its completeness or accuracy. EnerCom’s conclusions are based upon information gathered from sources deemed to be reliable. This note is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or financial instrument of any company mentioned in this note. This note was prepared for general circulation and does not provide investment recommendations specific to individual investors. All readers of the note must make their own investment decisions based upon their specific investment objectives and financial situation utilizing their own financial advisors as they deem necessary. Investors should consider a company’s entire financial and operational structure in making any investment decisions. Past performance of any company discussed in this note should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future results. EnerCom is a multi-disciplined management consulting services firm that regularly intends to seek business, or currently may be undertaking business, with companies covered on Oil & Gas 360®, and thereby seeks to receive compensation from these companies for its services. In addition, EnerCom, or its principals or employees, may have an economic interest in any of these companies. As a result, readers of EnerCom’s Oil & Gas 360® should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this note. EnerCom, or its principals or employees, may have an economic interest in any of the companies covered in this report or on Oil & Gas 360®. As a result, readers of EnerCom’s reports or Oil & Gas 360® should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report.