Groups say Bureau of Land Management was wrong to approve project
The Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance and the Sierra Club have filed an appeal challenging a Bureau of Land Management (BLM) decision in Utah, last Friday. The two groups say that the BLM was wrong to approve Fidelity Exploration & Production’s pipeline in the first place.
“BLM’s decision to consider Fidelity’s gathering pipeline system in isolation, and not take into account the environmental impacts from other projects necessary to make the gathering system work, is a textbook violation of environmental laws,” Landon Newell, staff attorney for the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance told KSL Utah.
The Dead Horse Lateral Pipeline is a project of Fidelity Exploration & Production Company, an MDU Resources (ticker: MDU) owned business. Fidelity wants to build the pipeline to carry currently flared natural gas off its oil production sites in the Big Flat area of Utah. The pipeline is expected to cost $70 million and run approximately 24 miles, according to Fidelity.
Fidelity expects that the cost of the project will likely be higher than the value realized from the sale of the natural gas, but it will reduce the visual impact of existing flares and decrease emissions. About 18 miles of the pipeline will be kept above ground in order to minimize disturbances to the landscape, and it will operate at very low pressures. The maximum pressure Fidelity plans to use in the 12-inch pipeline is 200 psi – far lower than the 1,500 psi normally used for large volume federally regulated interstate natural gas transmission pipelines. Fidelity’s presentation explaining the project and the company’s use of low impact procedures may be reviewed here.
Fidelity purchased leases to the wells in the Big Flat area in 2007, and has increased the pace of oil and gas activity in the area. In 2013, the wells at Big Flat flared enough natural gas to heat 236,000 homes, leading to the company’s decision to shut in the wells and construct a pipeline to transport the gas for eventual processing at a plant.
Important disclosures: The information provided herein is believed to be reliable; however, EnerCom, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to its completeness or accuracy. EnerCom’s conclusions are based upon information gathered from sources deemed to be reliable. This note is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or financial instrument of any company mentioned in this note. This note was prepared for general circulation and does not provide investment recommendations specific to individual investors. All readers of the note must make their own investment decisions based upon their specific investment objectives and financial situation utilizing their own financial advisors as they deem necessary. Investors should consider a company’s entire financial and operational structure in making any investment decisions. Past performance of any company discussed in this note should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future results. EnerCom is a multi-disciplined management consulting services firm that regularly intends to seek business, or currently may be undertaking business, with companies covered on Oil & Gas 360®, and thereby seeks to receive compensation from these companies for its services. In addition, EnerCom, or its principals or employees, may have an economic interest in any of these companies. As a result, readers of EnerCom’s Oil & Gas 360® should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this note. The company or companies covered in this note did not review the note prior to publication. EnerCom, or its principals or employees, may have an economic interest in any of the companies covered in this report or on Oil & Gas 360®. As a result, readers of EnerCom’s reports or Oil & Gas 360® should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report.