Crude Oil ( ) Brent Crude ( ) Natural Gas ( ) S&P 500 ( ) PHLX Oil ( )
An end of the year reflection on oil prices, global demand and OPEC by Greg Barnett

It’s Thursday morning, December 31, 2015.

I’m not going to sugar coat it – it’s been a tough year.  There have been family deaths, cancer scares, a heart attack, a huge Category 4 tornado that was too close for comfort, and a new granddaughter, but she’s going to need heart surgery in January to fix a heart valve.  Like I said, it’s been a tough year.

So, let’s talk about something more light-hearted.  Like the price of a barrel of crude oil.

I’m on record saying that I have seen more cycles than the Tour de France since starting my work in the oil and gas business back in 1981.  I’m not complaining.  That’s not what I do.  I love the industry and the people that I work with who, like me, made the conscious choice to work in this great industry regardless of the ups and downs.  In the up markets, we’re on top of the world.  In the down markets, we moonlight as piano players in the local ballet hall.

In 1982, George Mitchell began to experiment with completion techniques to crack open tight zones that he and his company, Mitchell Energy, believed contained economically producible quantities of natural gas.  Mitchell is the recognized first mover pioneer that created the 21st century oil and gas company.  By 2004, companies like Range Resources and Core Labs were drilling and evaluating tight sandstones and shales to extract crude oil and natural gas.  The result of this work, which began in earnest in 2004, propelled the U.S. into the number one position for oil and gas production by 2014.  In only 10 years, the U.S. went from producing 13.9 million barrels of oil equivalents (BOEs) per day to 20.5 MMBOE per day in 2014.  In other words, the successful development of shale resources caused a 47% increase in U.S. oil production.  Said another way, shale resource development increased domestic energy security by reducing OPEC oil imports to America, and that’s a problem for the oil cartel.  And they’ve made their problem our problem.

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics showed that the number of people employed in the oil and gas business expanded 62.3% between January 2005 and November 2014.  Why did I stop measuring in November 2014?  On November 27, 2014, the then 12-member oil cartel known as OPEC, decided it would maintain their 30 MMB per day output quota they originally set back in 2011.  In doing so, OPEC believed “The increase in oil and product stock levels in OECD countries, where days of forward cover are comfortably above the five-year average, coupled with the on-going rise in non-OECD inventories, are indications of an extremely well-supplied market.”  OPEC forecast oil demand growth in 2015 would be offset by an estimated increase of 1.6 MMB per day in non-OPEC supply.  In other words, OPEC and more importantly, Saudi Arabia, were dropping their traditional role as the swing producer, and forcing America to take on that role.  As my colleague James Constas made the point last August in Denver, calling the U.S. ‘Saudi America, the Unexpected Swing Producer.’

November 27, 2014, marked the start of the first global crude oil price war of the 21st century.  Price wars, when executed well, help the consumer and the companies that initiate the process can have a long-term profitable impact from greater market share, so long as the product and/or the company possess certain positive characteristics.  Consumers have benefited from price wars in many industries, including cell phones, brokerage fees, the cost of a round trip airline ticket to visit family during the holidays, and Lasik eye surgeries.

The current crude oil price war is helping the American consumer at the gas pump.  The price of regular unleaded gasoline averaged $2.821 for the week of November 24, 2014.  For the week of November 23, 2015, the average price was $2.094, a 26.3% decline.  However, American industrial capacity utilization declined 0.5% in November 2015 to 77.0%, a rate that is 3.1% below its long-run (1972–2014) average, and down 1.2% year-over-year.  The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve directly attributes the drop “…to sizable declines for coal mining and for oil and gas well drilling and servicing.”

It’s been more than a year since OPEC elected as a group to keep daily production flat, with Saudi Arabia deciding to let America and its OECD allies figure out how to drill wells in a considerably lower commodity regime.  OPEC, in its 168th meeting in Vienna on December 4, 2015, announced its belief that the world will demand more, not less of its production: “These developments indicate the onset of a more balanced market in 2016, with demand for OPEC crude expected to rise by 1.2 million barrels per day to average 30.8 million barrels per day for the year.”  Au contraire, mon cheri!

In one year’s time, OPEC, based on its 2014 decision to hold its collective production flat, has suffered from the self-flagellation to capture market share at the cost of social unrest.  On December 3, 2015, WTI was priced at $41.08 per barrel.  In less than 30 days, WTI prices hit $34.73 on December 18, a 15.5% drop.  China’s importation of Russian spot crude oil is surpassing Saudi Arabia.  Russian President Vladimir Putin is faced with a falling ruble, unrest in former Russian satellite countries, and needs the hard currency that oil sales bring (since all oil is priced in dollars).  “Принести деньги на Vladimir” (rough translation: “Bring the money to Vladimir!”).  China is forecast to import more crude oil in 2016 and signed a 2016 agreement with Saudi Aramco to deliver similar volumes next year as was delivered in 2014.  But those volumes, on a market share basis, are now about 15%, not 20% as was the case back in 2012.

We do not believe OPEC’s 2014 decision is achieving its stated goals. Some analysts peg the losses to the cartel at $500 billion, and is creating extreme stress on governments reliant on oil exports to fund their budgets. Algeria, Angola, Ecuador, Nigeria and Venezuela are all suffering mightily and the lost revenue has created intense divisions within the cartel. OPEC, “Are you misinformed or are you engaged in predatory pricing?”

Proving that an organization is engaged in predatory pricing that actually benefits the end-user, vis-à-vis, the consumer of crude oil, is difficult because the conventional wisdom among antitrust experts has long been that predatory pricing – a monopolist selling goods below cost – is not a particularly serious problem.  In fact, the courts regard predatory pricing as a so-called legal fiction: it’s theoretically against the law but nearly impossible to prove.

The first to discredit the concept of predatory pricing were members of the free-market “Chicago School of Economists.”  About two decades ago, they conducted studies indicating that when companies tried to drive away competitors with predatory pricing, they generally lost a fortune by doing so and then surrendered any market-share gains as soon as they raised prices.  Thomas Sowell, famed Chicago School economist said this about predatory pricing: “Obviously, predatory pricing pays off only if the surviving predator can then raise prices enough to recover the previous losses, making enough extra profit thereafter to justify the risks. These risks are not small.”

We’ll translate: we know in the oil and gas industry that the best remedy for low commodity prices is low commodity prices.  Oil producers adjust their spending and their production practices to improve efficiencies, which helps boost returns and improve cash flow in the down market, and then consumer and industrial demand rises as a result of the lower prices and then WHAM, there is an immediate shortage of production and commodity prices rise again.  We also know that when commodity prices rebound they do so sharply, as we witnessed during the late 2008 and 2009 period.  We also know that the November 27, 2014, OPEC decision to not be the swing producer is creating real pain for Saudi Arabia and its gang of 12.

The conclusion here is that we’re in a price war.  But what ultimately happens in a price war?

The companies who are the most agile, best funded, and have the best technologies with the best assets will win.  We believe that the U.S. and Canadian producer will win.  Why do we believe that?  As profit-seeking enterprises, the U.S. and Canadian oil producer does not have to produce crude oil to subsidize social programs, or provide stipends for its citizens to go to schools abroad, or subsidize the price of fuel its citizens must pay the government/royal family, or convert its production into cash to feed its citizens.

OPEC - Oil & Gas 360

How will the U.S. and Canadian producer win?  By adopting forward-thinking, strategic intentions and capabilities that win in the current price environment, rather than hoping, as one friend last night quipped, for higher crude oil prices.  Hope isn’t a strategy.  Here are steps that we know are either in place or in the works for the U.S. and Canadian producer:

  • Right-sizing now for long-term benefits: 2016 capex programs are right-sized, production targets are managed, balance sheets are addressed and asset portfolios are rationalized.
  • Competing on quality: companies are high-grading drilling programs and using technology to convert marginal assets into better tiered projects. Companies are utilizing the latest in technologies to generate the highest and best returns.
  • Cooperating with stakeholders: E&P and OFS working better together to harmonize total returns.
  • A little government help, in moderation please: Repeal the crude oil export ban? Check!  Pass Keystone?  Not yet.  Reform Dodd-Frank?  No yet.  Manage Fed policy and interest rates.  A Work-in-Progress.  Pass legislation reducing corporate tax rates?  When pigs fly!

OPEC - Oil & Gas 360Now.  About yesterday, Wednesday morning, December 30, 2015.

The EIA released its crude oil storage figure for the week ended December 25.  Crude stocks built 2.6 MMB week over week to 487.4 MMB; analysts estimated a draw 2.5 MMB.  Imports rose 0.6 MMB week-over-week to 7.9 MMB, 34.8% from OPEC.  We know that the U.S. doesn’t produce enough of its own crude oil to satisfy 100% of its demand, but Wednesday morning we were reminded that we are importing from members of the same cartel that believes gaining market share is more important than generating an economic return with each drilled well.

We interpret this to mean that the U.S. subsidizes an organization (OPEC) that started the price war!  Only in the oil business can a supplier treat its customers so bad and get away with it. Actually, we’re not so sure, the airlines aren’t exactly known for great customer service.

By Country

12/25/15

12/18/15

Change

Year Ago

Change

5-Yr Avg.

Change

Canada 3,143 3,230 (2.6%) 2,723 15.4% 2,335 34.6%
Saudi Arabia 1,047 903 15.9% 775 35.1% 1,024 2.2%
Iraq 618 395 56.4% 305 102.6% 424 45.8%
Kuwait 210 233 (10.9%) 156 34.6% 238 13.3%
Nigeria 136 100 36.0% 71 91.5% 356 (161.7%)
Angola 115 173 (50.4%) 181 (57.4%) 200 (73.9%)
Venezuela 629 685 (8.9%) 694 (10.3%) 889 (41.3%)
Mexico 791 587 25.8% 928 (17.3%) 969 (22.5%)

 

The table above shows the U.S. imported 2.75 MMB per day of crude oil from six of the 13 OPEC nations (Indonesia’s resumption of its full membership was approved on December 4), or 34.8% of the weekly import of 7.9 MMB per day.  That represents $770 million (using $40/oil) of hard-earned U.S. cash leaving the country, instead of being invested and spent in America (aka the “home grown spending on our own” strategy).  But the current U.S. administration is fighting corporate inversions (we are a country that was founded on the belief that taxation without representation is a basis for revolution), but it isn’t fighting cash flowing out of the U.S. like water through a sieve to pay for a product that its own U.S.-based companies can produce.  Does this cash outflow represent a form of subsidy by the U.S. for certain OPEC nations to fight ISIS?  Or to curry favors?  Canada is our closest ally.  Crude oil imports from our Maple-leaf buddy have held steady year-over year.  But we don’t worry about being blind-sided by Canada’s 10 provinces and three territories.

An illustration how much progress America has made in improving its energy security is the level of current oil imports compared to less than a decade. In January 2008, the U.S. imported 6.41 MMB per day from OPEC, but thanks to the U.S. shale revolution, OPEC’s market share exporting to the U.S. has dropped 57.1% in nearly eight years.

For 2015, the U.S. consumed more crude oil, in the form of gasoline.  Total U.S. liquid fuels consumption is projected to increase by 290,000 b/d (1.5%) in 2015, higher than the 140,000 b/d (0.8%) increase in 2014.  The EIA forecasts 2016 U.S. liquid fuels consumption to grow 160,000 b/d.  U.S. car and light duty truck sales are forecast to reach 17.5 million units in 2015, an all-time high.  The Federal Highway Administration in June 2015 forecast higher miles driven for all class of vehicles for the period of 2013 through 2030.  Boeing Corporation forecasts that “over the next 20 years, we are forecasting a need for 38,050 airplanes valued at more than $5.6 trillion. Aviation is becoming more diverse, with approximately 40% of all new airplanes being delivered to airlines based in the Asia Pacific region. An additional 20% will be delivered to airlines in Europe and North America, with the remaining 20% to be delivered to the Middle East, Latin America, the Commonwealth of Independent States, and Africa.”

OPEC is forecasting global crude oil demand to average 94.13 MMB/d in 2016, a 1.3% increase compared to 2015.  They are basing their forecasted growth to coincide with demand growth from non-OECD countries (read, third world countries with real world problems subsidized by OEDC countries.)  Paris-based IEA forecast global oil demand in 2016 to average 95.8 MMB per day.

OPEC - Oil & Gas 360

Part of the IEA’s forecast hinges on rising Chinese demand for gasoline.  As the Chinese middle class expands, they are expected to adopt Western middle class lifestyles.  Notwithstanding the unbreathable air in China, cars will be purchased and driven, rather than bicycles.

Okay, what is in store for the industry in 2016?  Drillers gonna drill.  Bankers gonna bank.  Investors gonna invest.  The low cost producers will drive marginal costs down in 2016.  By August companies will start hiring again. The Spring banking redetermination season will shock everyone because (a) nothing happened or (b) mergers happened that no one predicted.  There will be a few more bankruptcy filings, but not 41 like we saw in 2015.  We believe corporate value is still hidden in assets that are held by companies but those assets are only ancillary to the overall strategy.  As a result, M&A and A&D teams will be busier in 2016 than in 2015.

In a December survey conducted by Oil & Gas 360®, two-thirds of the operators who responded predicted that crude oil would average $40 to $50 per barrel in 2016.  Almost 60% of the investors who responded are thinking crude oil will average $40 to $50 per barrel.  With apologies to the fine flick Trading Places: “Advise our clients interested in crude oil to buy below $40.  Mr. Oil & Gas 360 has set the price.”

We believe the ability to export crude oil will not immediately impact the differential between WTI and Dated Brent, and uplift the U.S. benchmark until WTI gains more traction with exports.  We are hearing that certain U.S. management teams are working on new supply contracts with overseas buyers at prices that are higher than the WTI strip.  This is based on the U.S. being a politically stable source of oil supply, having the best oil laws, the best delivery system for transporting crude, and the biggest inventory of sustainable and profitable crude oil projects.  In other words, growing economies prefer to buy oil from a reliable supplier. These North American advantages are a big part of the reason Saudi Arabia initiated the price war and continues to pursue it, even at the cost of extreme financial pain.

Exports of natural gas volumes will begin.  We’re unsure yet if these volumes will command a significantly higher price per unit, but Western Europe is desperately seeking an alternative to Russian natural gas, given that Putin and his oligarchs have proven more than once they are willing to use the commodity as an economic weapon. We anticipate that once LNG exports to Europe commence, Putin will work day and nyet to make sure he gets his cut.  He does not control the open waters, so he cannot keep U.S. tankers from docking in Europe or China, but he has a network of established pipelines and can offer other sources of value that an America cannot.

Based on the five-year average of natural gas injections (normalcy bias can really screw up a forecast), we’re worried that natural gas storage will be at an all-time high come March 2016.  Where is the three-month Polar Vortex when you need it?

County and municipality ad valorem tax rolls will start to feel the pinch in 2016, then will come a baseball-bat-to-the-forehead as property valuations drop because of the lack of oil industry spending and the drop in revenues per well. Alaska’s state government is already talking about instituting an income tax on residents, as low oil prices have crippled the budget.

We’d be shocked if an OPEC Spring doesn’t happen in Venezuela or Colombia or Ecuador.  As the river of cash from the government subsidies turns into a trickle, social and political unrest is just around the corner. For Saudi Arabia, which is substantially increasing military spending to fight an Iranian-backed insurgency in neighboring Yemen, their self-created price war could not have come at a worst time.

What’s the call on the bottom?  600 rigs, 125 for natural gas and the rest for everything else.  We’re at 700.  The efficiency of drilling and completing an unconventional well is unmatched in the history of the industry.  For certain, the drilling of the Drake well back in August 1859 was ground breaking.  But it ain’t like drilling a horizontal well and staying in zone at 11,000 feet using a steerable drill motor for more than two miles, and then fracing the entire zone to discover 30 Bcf of natural gas rather than 1 Bcf from a 125 foot zone with a vertical well. Comparing today’s drilling and completion technology to that of just 20 years ago is akin to comparing the space shuttle to the crude airplane the Wright Brothers first flew at Kitty Hawk.

Stop drilling for crude oil and we’ll be importing more OPEC production and sending more American cash overseas.  The Big Five Basins – Permian, Appalachian, Williston, Eagle Ford and Gulf of Mexico – will have ebbs and flows with the rig count, but these are the basins that are expected to keep the U.S. lights on and the industrial complex working.  Mid-Continent, Haynesville, California, and Alaska will be challenged, not by ideas, but rather by the expense of doing business.  Put 50 rigs to work in the Haynesville and even a recovering accountant can negotiate reasonable terms for an ongoing drilling program.

Isn’t it time that someone other than Harold Hamm embrace the “Produced Here in America by Americans for Americans” campaign?  Or has that 1980s cargo tanker sailed and the consumer is so engrossed in binge watching Netflix with their Frappuccino with no fracing whip to give a care where their energy really comes from?  $770 million of cash sailing away each week from the U.S. should be cause enough to say Dammit, I’m tired of this and I won’t stand for it anymore.


Important disclosures: The information provided herein is believed to be reliable; however, EnerCom, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to its completeness or accuracy. EnerCom’s conclusions are based upon information gathered from sources deemed to be reliable. This note is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or financial instrument of any company mentioned in this note. This note was prepared for general circulation and does not provide investment recommendations specific to individual investors. All readers of the note must make their own investment decisions based upon their specific investment objectives and financial situation utilizing their own financial advisors as they deem necessary. Investors should consider a company’s entire financial and operational structure in making any investment decisions. Past performance of any company discussed in this note should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future results. EnerCom is a multi-disciplined management consulting services firm that regularly intends to seek business, or currently may be undertaking business, with companies covered on Oil & Gas 360®, and thereby seeks to receive compensation from these companies for its services. In addition, EnerCom, or its principals or employees, may have an economic interest in any of these companies. As a result, readers of EnerCom’s Oil & Gas 360® should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this note. EnerCom, or its principals or employees, may have an economic interest in any of the companies covered in this report or on Oil & Gas 360®. As a result, readers of EnerCom’s reports or Oil & Gas 360® should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report.