A district court judge allows litigation to lift a Colorado frac ban to proceed
District Court Judge C. Scott Crabtree has decided not to dismiss a motion from the Colorado Oil & Gas Association (COGA) to lift a local moratorium on hydraulic fracturing in Broomfield, Colorado. The city of Broomfield passed a measure in 2013 that put a five year moratorium on fracing. COGA filed a complaint for declaratory judgment to invalidate the frac ban on November 24, 2014, which the city of Broomfield asked to be dismissed.
In a written statement from Judge Crabtree, he said he would not throw out the complaint because COGA has legal standing to contest the ban, reports the Broomfield Enterprise. In the ruling, Crabtree said COGA effectively argued a loss of productivity “to a legally-protected interest – the right to develop oil and gas resources … without interference from local regulators.”
When Broomfield filed a motion to dismiss COGA’s complaint in January, the city said COGA could not prove it had been affected by the frac ban. Broomfield’s motion also claimed that COGA failed to identify specific oil and gas companies that had tried to frac in Broomfield “and been thwarted” by the ban.
COGA said that at least one company, Blue Chip Oil Inc., had a desire to use hydraulic fracturing in Broomfield, but was barred due to the ban.
Oil and gas company Sovereign also took legal action over the moratorium and won an exemption from the frac ban because of a memorandum of understanding it had in place with the city before voters approved the measure that halted fracing.
Colorado Remains Battleground for Oil & Gas Development
Governor John Hickenlooper, who was recently featured in an exclusive interview with Oil & Gas 360®, has historically sided with the energy industry. After a variety of pro and anti-development measures nearly made the ballot last November, the Governor implemented a 21-person task force to make recommendations on how to increase cooperation between producers and residents throughout the Centennial State. About a dozen proposals were made, intending to give the local communities “more voice” and more access to their neighboring operators. Those proposals are currently being reviewed.
Colorado has played host to numerous standoffs involving hydraulic fracturing and its practices. Five communities have enforced fracing bans since 2012, but the public has since begun to sway in favor of hydrocarbon development. The bans in three of the five communities were overturned in the span of just one month last summer, and another community close to the Denver-Julesburg Basin turned down a proposed fracing moratorium.
Important disclosures: The information provided herein is believed to be reliable; however, EnerCom, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to its completeness or accuracy. EnerCom’s conclusions are based upon information gathered from sources deemed to be reliable. This note is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or financial instrument of any company mentioned in this note. This note was prepared for general circulation and does not provide investment recommendations specific to individual investors. All readers of the note must make their own investment decisions based upon their specific investment objectives and financial situation utilizing their own financial advisors as they deem necessary. Investors should consider a company’s entire financial and operational structure in making any investment decisions. Past performance of any company discussed in this note should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future results. EnerCom is a multi-disciplined management consulting services firm that regularly intends to seek business, or currently may be undertaking business, with companies covered on Oil & Gas 360®, and thereby seeks to receive compensation from these companies for its services. In addition, EnerCom, or its principals or employees, may have an economic interest in any of these companies. As a result, readers of EnerCom’s Oil & Gas 360® should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this note. The company or companies covered in this note did not review the note prior to publication. EnerCom, or its principals or employees, may have an economic interest in any of the companies covered in this report or on Oil & Gas 360®. As a result, readers of EnerCom’s reports or Oil & Gas 360® should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report.