Crude Oil ( ) Brent Crude ( ) Natural Gas ( ) S&P 500 ( ) PHLX Oil ( )

Refiners say making them the obligated party for fuel blending is “misguided”

Independent refiners are asking the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to shift responsibility for complying with biofuel programs from refiners to fuel blenders. Delta Airlines’ (ticker: DAL) Monroe Energy LLC, Carlyle Group’s (ticker: CG) Philadelphia Energy Solutions, Valero Energy Corp (ticker: VLO) and Ronald E Minsk, who recently served as a special assistant to President Obama, are among those asking for the change, reports Reuters.

The refiners argue that it should not be their responsible to blend biofuels or to buy compliance credits from companies that have done so, because not all oil refiners have blending capacity. The group asked the EPA to make fuel blenders responsible for meeting this portion of the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS).

Minks said that blenders have little incentive to blend greater volumes because they are not responsible to show compliance. Valero said the change would promote both availability and lower retail prices.

Resetting sights on the RFS

In June, the EPA lowered the renewable fuels goals for 2015 and 2016 from those set by Congress to better reflect historical averages and realistically view potential future growth. The RFS covers standards for cellulosic biofuel, like ethanol, biomass-based diesel and advanced biofuels.epa-fuelstandard

For 2015, total proposed RFS requirements are now 16.3 billion gallons versus 20.5 billion gallons in the statutory requirement set by Congress. For 2016, the EPA lowered the proposed RFS requirements to 17.4 billion gallons from 22.25 billion gallons. The EPA also proposed 1.90 billion gallons of biomass-based diesel for 2017.

The EPA’s proposed targets for renewable fuels were revised down from those set by Congress in the Clean Air Act, saying that, “due to constraints in the fuel market to accommodate increasing volumes of ethanol, along with limits on the availability of non-ethanol renewable fuels, the volume targets specified by Congress … cannot be achieved.”

Important disclosures: The information provided herein is believed to be reliable; however, EnerCom, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to its completeness or accuracy. EnerCom’s conclusions are based upon information gathered from sources deemed to be reliable. This note is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or financial instrument of any company mentioned in this note. This note was prepared for general circulation and does not provide investment recommendations specific to individual investors. All readers of the note must make their own investment decisions based upon their specific investment objectives and financial situation utilizing their own financial advisors as they deem necessary. Investors should consider a company’s entire financial and operational structure in making any investment decisions. Past performance of any company discussed in this note should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future results. EnerCom is a multi-disciplined management consulting services firm that regularly intends to seek business, or currently may be undertaking business, with companies covered on Oil & Gas 360®, and thereby seeks to receive compensation from these companies for its services. In addition, EnerCom, or its principals or employees, may have an economic interest in any of these companies. As a result, readers of EnerCom’s Oil & Gas 360® should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this note. EnerCom, or its principals or employees, may have an economic interest in any of the companies covered in this report or on Oil & Gas 360®. As a result, readers of EnerCom’s reports or Oil & Gas 360® should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report.