Philadelphia tries to decide what to do with PGW
The city of Philadelphia has been wrestling with a decision over what to do with city owned utility Philadelphia Gas Works (PGW).
Mayor Michael Nutter spent two years, and PGW spent more than $2 million, in order to attract a buyer for the utility, reports Philly.com. After attracting a buyer, UIL Holdings Corp. (ticker: UIL) of New Haven, Connecticut, Nutter had hoped to sell PGW for $1.86 billion in a deal that would get Philadelphia out of the energy business and bolster its struggling pension fund.
Not everyone is satisfied with this deal, however. Philadelphia City Council President Darrell L. Clarke announced that the Council would not consider the UIL sale, according to a separate Philly.com report. Opponents of the sale say Mayor Nutter did not consider alternatives before he launched the formal sale process in 2013. The UIL agreement to purchase PGW was announced in March 2014.
Concentric Energy Advisors was commissioned to conduct a study of the city’s best options regarding PGW. Concentric’s report is entitled Philadelphia Gas Works Highest and Best Use Study. The report was presented to the Philadelphia City Council in Oct. 2014.
One of the alternatives is expanding PGW’s LNG plant to produce more liquefied natural gas. PGW already owns a LNG plant on Port Richmond Waterfront that is operating under capacity, and could be used to satisfy a lucrative market if expansion of its liquefaction capacity is undertaken.
The Concentric report said that PGW could more than double its profits from off-system LNG sales to $7.7 million to $10 million a year, recovering the cost of a LNG liquefaction plant expansion in four to eight years.
In its report, which explored several ways to increase PGW’s revenue and reduce costs, Concentric said PGW could achieve the biggest saving – up to $17 million a year – by buying natural gas from the Marcellus Shale region rather than from Gulf Coast producers. Concentric said that it viewed “a dramatic expansion to serve LNG export markets as unrealistic and non-viable under any PGW partnership or ownership structure.”
Concentric said “PGW is too late to the competition” to export LNG from Philadelphia, but that expanding their operation would more closely conjoin the utility to a growing private-sector movement to build up the region as the Marcellus Shale energy hub.
Other options in the Concentric report included PGW supporting the creation of a regional natural gas vehicle (NGV) market.
Important disclosures: The information provided herein is believed to be reliable; however, EnerCom, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to its completeness or accuracy. EnerCom’s conclusions are based upon information gathered from sources deemed to be reliable. This note is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or financial instrument of any company mentioned in this note. This note was prepared for general circulation and does not provide investment recommendations specific to individual investors. All readers of the note must make their own investment decisions based upon their specific investment objectives and financial situation utilizing their own financial advisors as they deem necessary. Investors should consider a company’s entire financial and operational structure in making any investment decisions. Past performance of any company discussed in this note should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future results. EnerCom is a multi-disciplined management consulting services firm that regularly intends to seek business, or currently may be undertaking business, with companies covered on Oil & Gas 360®, and thereby seeks to receive compensation from these companies for its services. In addition, EnerCom, or its principals or employees, may have an economic interest in any of these companies. As a result, readers of EnerCom’s Oil & Gas 360® should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this note. The company or companies covered in this note did not review the note prior to publication. EnerCom, or its principals or employees, may have an economic interest in any of the companies covered in this report or on Oil & Gas 360®. As a result, readers of EnerCom’s reports or Oil & Gas 360® should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report.