GMX Resources is an oil and natural gas exploration and production company currently targeting oil prospects in the Williston Basin Bakken/Three Forks, and the DJ Basin Niobrara. GMXR also operates in the Haynesville/Bossier Formation and the Cotton Valley Sand Formation in the East Texas Basin.

Last year, GMXR initiated a significant ongoing transition from its natural gas weighted assets in East Texas to an oil focus through its entrance into the Bakken and Niobrara. In one year, GMXR has gone from producing no oil in North Dakota to operating and participating in a total of 12 Bakken wells. OAG360 notes this will be slow transition to oil – the company has stopped drilling its Haynesville/Bossier acreage and put in place a 1.2 Bcfe Volumetric Production Payment (VPP) to focus its efforts on oil opportunities in the Williston Basin. This will have an increasing impact in coming quarter on production volumes and revenues.

Recent Financial Results

During Q1’12, GMXR reported a net loss of $40.6 million, or a loss of $0.66 per share, compared to a net loss of $54.5 million, or a loss of $1.29 per share during the first quarter last year. Oil and natural gas sales during Q1’12 decreased 41% to $17.4 million compared to $29.4 million during Q1’11. OAG360 notes that readers should be aware that 21% of the 41% decrease in oil and natural gas sales is attributable to GMXR’s Haynesville/Bossier natural gas production suspension, and 20% of the 41% decrease is attributable to its 1.2 Bcfe VPP agreement. As mentioned earlier, oil volumes need to steadily increase for GMXR over coming quarters. During Q1’12, oil production increased 41% to 31 MBbls (341 BOPD), from 22 MBbls last year as a result of the company’s new Bakken production. In addition, the company expects to add as many as six additional wells during Q2’12 which should help the company achieve its 80 MBbls guidance. Approximately $68 million of GMXR’s $97 million CAPEX budget will be allocated to its drilling and development initiatives in the Bakken.

[sam_ad id=”32″ codes=”true”]

Strong Well Performance Coming out of the Bakken

On May 7, 2012, GMXR reported results from its fifth operated well in McKenzie County. The Akovenko 24-34-1H (66% WI), achieved a peak rate of 1,483 BOEPD. GMXR is still awaiting the completion of the fracture stimulation job on its sixth operated well in McKenzie County, North Dakota. GMXR’s fourth operated well, the Lange 11-30-1H (89% WI), achieved a company record peak production rate of 2,549 BOEPD. All together, these four operated wells place GMXR’s average peak flow rate for its McKenzie County wells at 1,855 BOEPD. On the non-operated side, the company achieved strong completions on its first two non-operated Bakken wells as well with the Marsh 21-16TFH (Whiting-operated; 2% WI) and Taboo 1-25-36H (Slawson-operated; 25% WI), which flowed back at average IP rates of 2,694 BOEPD gross and 1,436 BOEPD gross, respectively.

The company did mention on its Q1’12 conference call they are seeing operational synergies emerging in the Williston Basin. GMXR has reduced completed well costs to $8.0 million from $8.5 million per well by drilling wells faster (30 days per well), more efficiently. Further, third party completion costs continue to decline. With the improvement of well costs coming down and better well results, GMX said its projected IRR is now in the range of 50% to 60%.


Important disclosures: The information provided herein is believed to be reliable; however, EnerCom, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to its completeness or accuracy. EnerCom’s conclusions are based upon information gathered from sources deemed to be reliable. This note is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or financial instrument of any company mentioned in this note. This note was prepared for general circulation and does not provide investment recommendations specific to individual investors. All readers of the note must make their own investment decisions based upon their specific investment objectives and financial situation utilizing their own financial advisors as they deem necessary. Investors should consider a company’s entire financial and operational structure in making any investment decisions. Past performance of any company discussed in this note should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future results. EnerCom is a multi-disciplined management consulting services firm that regularly intends to seek business, or currently may be undertaking business, with companies covered on Oil & Gas 360®, and thereby seeks to receive compensation from these companies for its services. In addition, EnerCom, or its principals or employees, may have an economic interest in any of these companies. As a result, readers of EnerCom’s Oil & Gas 360® should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this note. The company or companies covered in this note did not review the note prior to publication. EnerCom, or its principals or employees, may have an economic interest in any of the companies covered in this report or on Oil & Gas 360®. As a result, readers of EnerCom’s reports or Oil & Gas 360® should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. As of the report date, neither EnerCom nor any of its employees has a financial interest in any equity or debt of any company mentioned in this report.

Legal Notice