H.R. 1679, addressing “the safe transportation of Bakken crude oil by rail,” was introduced to the United States Senate on March 26, 2015, one day after a the S.859 bill was issued regarding oil volatility and increased railroad transportation safety. The recent attention for improving the safety of crude by rail has been pushed by a handful of Democrats, including Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Washington), the leader of the S.859. “This bill is showing our impatience with the fact that (the White House plan) doesn’t include volatility and we think it should,” she said to Reuters.

2014 crude by rail map eiaThere have been four train derailments thus far in 2015, but, fortunately, no injuries. The use of crude by rail has climbed considerably in recent years as the U.S. shale boom has pushed takeaway capacity to its limits. Rail takeaway capacity in North Dakota is six times greater than it was in 2011. Crude pipelines have only doubled in the same time frame.

A letter obtained by Reuters that was signed by seven Democratic Senators called the cars “outdated,” and “pose a very immediate and undeniable risk to communities all across the United States.” Current plans being considered by the White House include adding more steel to existing shells and implementing more advanced designs to the new cars. The American Petroleum Institute issued a news release calling for improving rail safety in general, rather than focus on the actual contents of the shipments.

A September 2014 report from the American Association of Railroads says the number of incidents in relation to miles traveled is at its lowest level in history. The report also says railroads have invested $115 billion back into its infrastructure in the last five years, and companies are constantly implementing new technology.

Important disclosures: The information provided herein is believed to be reliable; however, EnerCom, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to its completeness or accuracy. EnerCom’s conclusions are based upon information gathered from sources deemed to be reliable. This note is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or financial instrument of any company mentioned in this note. This note was prepared for general circulation and does not provide investment recommendations specific to individual investors. All readers of the note must make their own investment decisions based upon their specific investment objectives and financial situation utilizing their own financial advisors as they deem necessary. Investors should consider a company’s entire financial and operational structure in making any investment decisions. Past performance of any company discussed in this note should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future results. EnerCom is a multi-disciplined management consulting services firm that regularly intends to seek business, or currently may be undertaking business, with companies covered on Oil & Gas 360®, and thereby seeks to receive compensation from these companies for its services. In addition, EnerCom, or its principals or employees, may have an economic interest in any of these companies. As a result, readers of EnerCom’s Oil & Gas 360® should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this note. The company or companies covered in this note did not review the note prior to publication. EnerCom, or its principals or employees, may have an economic interest in any of the companies covered in this report or on Oil & Gas 360®. As a result, readers of EnerCom’s reports or Oil & Gas 360® should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report.

EIA Crude by Rail Movements - Press Release

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 30, 2015
EIA rolls out monthly data on crude oil movements by rail
For the first time, EIA is providing monthly data on rail movements of crude oil, which have significantly increased over the past five years. The new data on crude-by-rail (CBR) movements are fully integrated with EIA’s existing monthly petroleum supply statistics, which already include crude oil movements by pipeline, tanker, and barge.
"The new crude-by-rail data provides a clearer picture on a mode of oil transportation that has experienced rapid growth in recent years and is of great interest to policy makers, the public, and industry," said EIA Administrator Adam Sieminski. "EIA expects that the new data it has developed using information provided by the U.S. Surface Transportation Board (STB) along with data from other third-party sources and our own survey data, will provide key insights into oil-by-rail movements, including shipments to and from Canada," he said. "We welcome the cooperation of the STB as well as Canada’s National Energy Board in making these data accessible."
EIA is initiating the new series with monthly data from January 2010 through the current reporting month, January 2015. CBR activity is tracked between pairs of Petroleum Administration for Defense District (PADD) regions (inter-PADD), within each region (intra-PADD), and across the U.S.-Canada border.
EIA is sponsoring a webinar on March 31 at 11:00 a.m. to explain the new CBR data. The webinar sign-up information is located on EIA’s new U.S. Movements of Crude Oil By Rail webpage. Upcoming articles in EIA’s Today in Energy and This Week in Petroleum briefs, scheduled for March 31 and April 1, respectively, will provide additional insights on the new data.
Like all of EIA's monthly petroleum data, the new CBR data are subject to revision as new information becomes available. Near-month CBR data are modeled estimates that will be updated upon receipt of quarterly information from the STB. EIA and the Association of American Railroads (AAR) are currently exploring opportunities for EIA to utilize monthly AAR carload data to refine the near-month CBR data.
The new historical CBR data help explain developments in domestic and U.S.-Canada crude oil flows.
• CBR's role in supporting growth in light tight oil production in the Bakken and Niobrara regions: Bakken oil production has increased by more than 1 million barrels per day (bbl/d) since 2010. Niobrara oil production has experienced 300,000 bbl/d growth from January 2010 to January 2015. Currently 70% of Bakken production and 64% of Niobrara production are transported by rail. The rapid building of unit train loading terminals, which typically require only 6-12 months to construct, has been important to accommodating oil output growth in these regions.
• CBR's options have enabled oil movements to new destinations: In 2010, crude-by-rail movements were primarily within the Midwest to Cushing, Oklahoma, where the crude would be transferred to pipelines.The flexibility and adaptability of CBR has facilitated new flows from the Midwest to the East Coast and West Coast, as well as from the Rocky Mountains to the East Coast and Canada.
• CBR's impact on other transportation modes: In 2010, the primary flow of crude oil was north from the U.S. Gulf Coast region by pipeline into the Midwest, but significant Bakken production combined with rail transportation reduced the need for the northern flow and introduced pipeline and rail movements of crude oil from the Midwest south into the U.S. Gulf Coast.
• CBR's contribution to displacement of crude oil imports: In 2010, East Coast refineries were entirely dependent on waterborne deliveries of crude oil from foreign sources. Although crude oil imports from Canada continue to grow, 300,000 bbl/d in rail receipts from the Bakken in 2014 have led to a 60% reduction in waterborne imports from the rest of the world, as indicated by data available through EIA's U.S. Crude Oil Import Tracking Tool.
The product described in this press release was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA's data, analysis, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in the product and press release therefore should not be construed as representing those of the Department of Energy or other federal agencies.
EIA Program Contact: Mindi Farber-DeAnda, 202-586-6419, [email protected]
EIA Press Contact: Jonathan Cogan, 202-586-8719, [email protected]
EIA-2015-02

U.S. Energy Information Administration
Contact Us | Washington, DC | www.eia.gov  


Legal Notice