Crude Oil ( ) Brent Crude ( ) Natural Gas ( ) S&P 500 ( ) PHLX Oil ( )

Mountaintop removal makes up most of West Virginia’s surface production

Coal production from the use of mountaintop removal (MTR) has declined by 62% since 2008, according to information from the Energy Information Administration (EIA). Total U.S. coal production was down just 15% from 2008 to 2014, while coal mined through surface production methods, which includes MTR, was down 21% in the same time period.

MTR Coal Removal

Total U.S. coal production includes both surface and underground mining activity. Surface mining includes contour strip, area, open pit and MTR. In mountaintop removal, coal seams running through the upper portion of a mountain are mined by removing all of the overlying rock and soil.

The EIA’s calculations are based off the number of permits received by companies to conduct MTR operations, but do not show the actual tonnage of coal production from the process. Because of those limitations, the EIA’s information represents just the upper bound of MTR production.

MTR is prevalent in the Central Appalachia, especially in West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia and, in the past, Tennessee. While not outright banned in Tennessee, legislation passed in the state in 2013 prevents specific coal mining operations more than 2,000 feet above sea level, effectively ending MTR operations in the state. No new MTR permits have been issued in Tennessee since 2007.

MTR by State

West Virginia accounts for most domestic MTR production, with mountaintop removal making up 61% of the state’s surface production in 2013.

Coal Production Sliding

MTR production is not the only facet of coal losing ground in the energy production race. Coal in general is continuously losing market share to, most specifically, natural gas and renewables.

In the EIA’s 2015 Annual Energy Outlook, U.S. coal production in 2013 fell below one billion short tons of output for the first time in two decades. 2013 numbers declined by 3.1% on a year-over-year basis. On a forecast basis, coal production is expected to rise in line with increased worldwide energy demand, but the reports do not take into account the proposed Clean Power Plan from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

If the Plan is implemented, EIA analysis predicts that levels of coal production will fall to levels last seen in the late 1970’s, with coal production in the West being particularly hard-hit. In all cases, production recovers by 2040, but never reaches the same levels as the EIA forecasts without the Clean Power Plan.

The North American Electric Reliability Corporation published the findings from its new grid reliability study, reporting that the EPA’s Clean Power Plan would require a “transformative shift” in energy infrastructure to meet the EPA goals, which calls for a 30% reduction in carbon emissions from power plants by 2030.

Tags: ,

Important disclosures: The information provided herein is believed to be reliable; however, EnerCom, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to its completeness or accuracy. EnerCom’s conclusions are based upon information gathered from sources deemed to be reliable. This note is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or financial instrument of any company mentioned in this note. This note was prepared for general circulation and does not provide investment recommendations specific to individual investors. All readers of the note must make their own investment decisions based upon their specific investment objectives and financial situation utilizing their own financial advisors as they deem necessary. Investors should consider a company’s entire financial and operational structure in making any investment decisions. Past performance of any company discussed in this note should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future results. EnerCom is a multi-disciplined management consulting services firm that regularly intends to seek business, or currently may be undertaking business, with companies covered on Oil & Gas 360®, and thereby seeks to receive compensation from these companies for its services. In addition, EnerCom, or its principals or employees, may have an economic interest in any of these companies. As a result, readers of EnerCom’s Oil & Gas 360® should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this note. EnerCom, or its principals or employees, may have an economic interest in any of the companies covered in this report or on Oil & Gas 360®. As a result, readers of EnerCom’s reports or Oil & Gas 360® should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report.